Skip to main content

Reference chart

What a Meeting Costs

By &Pixels, the studio that builds MyCalculator.to. Figures are fully loaded at 1.3 times base salary, on a 2,080 hour year, in US dollars.

A cost grid by headcount and salary, the annual figure for a recurring one, and why the short daily meeting is the expensive one.

How much does a meeting cost?

Salary, multiplied by about 1.3 to reach what the person actually costs, divided by 2,080 hours, multiplied by everyone in the room and by how long they are in it. On a $100,000 average that comes out at roughly $62.50 per person per hour, so eight people for an hour is $500.

The multiplier is not padding. Employer taxes, benefits, equipment and workspace are real money, and leaving them out is why most published figures are a third too low.

One hour, by headcount and salary

People$60k$80k$100k$150k
3$113$150$188$281
5$188$250$313$469
8$300$400$500$750
12$450$600$750$1,125
20$750$1,000$1,250$1,875

Salary figures across the top are the average in the room, and the cost scales in a straight line, so halving the length halves the number and adding a person adds one share. Count everybody who attends rather than everybody who speaks.

The calculators behind this

The annual cost of a recurring meeting

Cadence5 people8 people12 people
Daily standup, 15 minutes$18,000$28,800$43,100
Weekly, 1 hour$14,400$23,000$34,500
Fortnightly, 90 minutes$11,300$18,000$27,000
Monthly, 2 hours$7,500$12,000$18,000

Read the first two rows against each other. The fifteen minute standup is a quarter the length of the weekly hour and costs about 25 percent more across the year, because it happens roughly 230 times rather than 46. Frequency beats duration, and it is the variable nobody examines when they are deciding whether a meeting is worth keeping.

That is also the case for pricing the series rather than the occurrence. A single $500 meeting never gets questioned. A standing commitment of $23,000 a year is the sort of line item that would need a business case if it were software.

Where the 1.3 comes from

ComponentShare of base salary
Base salary1.00
Employer payroll taxesabout 0.08
Health and retirement benefits0.10 to 0.20
Equipment, software, workspace0.05 to 0.15
Fully loaded, commonly used1.25 to 1.40

How to work out yours

  1. Take each attendee’s annual salary. An average across the room is close enough. Precision here does not change the decision.
  2. Multiply by 1.3 for the real cost. Employer taxes, benefits and overhead. Base salary alone understates by roughly a third.
  3. Divide by 2,080 for an hourly rate. Forty hours a week across fifty-two weeks. A $100,000 salary is about $62.50 loaded per hour.
  4. Multiply by attendees and duration. Count everyone who attends, not everyone who speaks. Eight people for an hour at that rate is $500.
  5. Multiply by how often it recurs. This is the step that matters. A weekly meeting happens 46 times a year and is an annual purchase, not a $500 one.

For your own numbers rather than the grid, the meeting cost calculator takes salaries and a duration directly. If the meeting in question is a standup, the daily standup generator exists to make the asynchronous version workable, and the time tracker will tell you what the week actually went on, which is usually a more uncomfortable number than any of these.

Formula & Methodology

💡

Did you know? The 2,080 hour year is forty hours across fifty-two weeks with nothing removed for holidays or leave. It exists to convert between salaries and rates rather than to describe anybody's actual availability, which for most organisations lands between 1,800 and 1,900 hours once paid time off is taken out.

Sources

  • US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, on benefits as a share of total compensation
  • Standard 2,080 hour year convention used in salary to hourly rate conversion
  • Published fully loaded cost multipliers of 1.25 to 1.4 in cost accounting practice

Common questions

Frequently Asked Questions

About $500 for eight people on a $100,000 average salary, once benefits and overhead are included. The arithmetic is salary times 1.3 for the fully loaded cost, divided by 2,080 working hours, multiplied by the number of attendees and the duration. The grid above covers the common combinations, and the figure scales linearly, so doubling either the room or the length doubles the cost.

What an employee costs the organisation rather than what appears on their payslip. It adds employer payroll taxes, health and retirement contributions, equipment, software and workspace to the base salary. The usual multiplier is 1.25 to 1.4, so a $100,000 salary costs roughly $130,000. Meeting cost calculators that use base salary alone understate the answer by about a third.

No, and this is the result people find surprising. A fifteen minute standup is a quarter of the time of a one hour weekly meeting, but it happens roughly 230 times a year against 46, so it costs about 25 percent more annually. For eight people on a $100,000 average that is around $28,800 against $23,000. Short does not mean cheap when the frequency is high enough.

Two thousand and eighty, as the standard figure: forty hours across fifty-two weeks. It deliberately ignores holidays and leave, which is why it is used for rate conversions rather than for capacity planning. If you want actual available hours, most organisations land between 1,800 and 1,900 once paid time off and public holidays are removed.

It changes behaviour, which is the argument for it, and it can read as an accusation aimed at whoever called the meeting, which is the argument against. The more useful version is to price the recurring series rather than the single occurrence, because that is the decision actually worth revisiting. Nobody defends a $500 meeting. A $23,000 standing commitment gets examined.

More for the working week

1 / 6